Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, having an 87 score against 72.7. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 876 x 2142px and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
Motorola razr (2020) features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy J7 Refine features improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.