Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 267 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a 79.2 score against 72.7. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s body is a lot newer and incredibly thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine's, but it's a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy J7 Refine features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 14 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy J7 Refine features a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much better video definition.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.