Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is better than Galaxy J7 Refine, having a global score of 80.8 against 72.7. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Nokia XR20 body is noticeably newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than Galaxy J7 Refine.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a greater pixels amount per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Nokia XR20 has a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has 4 GB more RAM. Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rate.
Nokia XR20 has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.