Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a overall score of 76.2 against 72.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the nubia Red Magic 5S is noticeably newer than Galaxy J7 Refine, it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a quite superior performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot better video quality. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.