Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 general score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, it's a bit thinner and also way newer.
Galaxy A52 5G has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a way greater pixels number per screen inch and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features improved battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.