Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's global score of 72.7. The Galaxy A70 construction is newer and a bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a higher pixel density and a larger screen. The Galaxy A70 features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A70 features longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy J7 Refine has a way better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.