Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than Galaxy J7 Refine, having a general score of 92.9 against 72.7. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it's also a bit heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a greater display pixels density, a larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A71 5G UW features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.