Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a general score of 97.6 against 72.7. Galaxy Fold's body is newer and a lot thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it is also incredibly heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo, providing the user a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a higher screen density, a lot bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Galaxy Fold captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.