Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with a overall score of 90.8 against 72.7. The Galaxy Note 20 design is much newer and a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy J7 Refine. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a bigger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a back camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.