Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's general score of 72.7. Galaxy Note10 is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. The Galaxy Note10 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a quite larger display.
Galaxy Note10 features a greater processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Note10 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.