Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a 93.6 score against 72.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is just a little heavier than Galaxy J7 Refine, it's just a little thinner and also newer. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a faster processor than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S10 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10 5G features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.