Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, getting an 89.7 score against 72.7. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer and a bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it's also just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a greater processing power than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a larger screen and a greater screen density. Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.