Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a larger display, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition, a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.