Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with an 82.6 score against 72.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and much lighter cellphone than Galaxy J7 Refine.
The Galaxy S25 features a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Galaxy J7 Refine counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a way better video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S25 counts with a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.