Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Refine's 72.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is an a lot older and a little thicker phone than the Galaxy J7 Refine, but Samsung made it lighter anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has an older 4.4.2 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a way better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Galaxy S5 Sport shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a more MP back facing camera and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB and 32 GB internal memory. The Galaxy J7 Refine features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.