Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a global score of 79.5 against 72.7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an extremely older cellphone than Galaxy J7 Refine, but it's lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixels count per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy J7 Refine features a better storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy J7 Refine also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy J7 Refine counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S7 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.