Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, having a general score of 81 against 72.7. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Galaxy J7 Refine.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a quite bigger display and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a lot smaller sensor, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.