Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Refine, with a global score of 88.5 against 72.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Galaxy J7 Refine. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a battery life that's just as good as Galaxy J7 Refine's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.