Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, getting a 92.3 score against 72.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much better screen density, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy J7 Refine both feature incredibly similar battery durations. Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.