Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, having a overall score of 81.6 against 72.7. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction is a lot newer than the Galaxy J7 Refine's, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a better screen density, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 144 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher video definition.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.