Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is much better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with a global score of 82.4 against 72.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 Refine, it's just a little thinner and also newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more MP back camera and a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.