Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, having a overall score of 83 against 72.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T design is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine's, but it's just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a larger display and a greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.