Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Star, having a global score of 88.7 against 73.1. Apple iPhone 12 is a extremely newer phone, and it's also a bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star. The Apple iPhone 12 has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 Star counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
IPhone 12 features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a higher amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 12 features a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher pixels count per inch of screen, a much higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 12, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 Star features longer battery duration than iPhone 12, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 12 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way higher video definition.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 12, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.