Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 has a global score of 91.5, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. Apple iPhone 13's design is noticeably newer, somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Apple iPhone 13 comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
IPhone 13 has a really superior performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way greater pixels amount per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a little larger screen.
The Apple iPhone 13 has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 13, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
Although Apple iPhone 13 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.