Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro is a incredibly newer and thinner device than the Galaxy J7 Star, but it's somewhat heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy J7 Star works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a much better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.