Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a bigger screen and a much greater pixels density. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 13 Pro Max features superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a slightly better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a way better video quality.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy J7 Star, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.