Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Blue | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Star, getting a overall score of 94.9 against 73.1. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 Star comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Although the iPhone 14 Pro Max is extremely heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star, it's a bit thinner and also much newer.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and more RAM. IPhone 14 Pro Max has a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot greater display pixels density, a bigger display and a lot higher 1290 x 2796 pixels resolution.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.