Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s has an overall score of 83, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star's general score of 73.1. The iPhone 6s is an extremely older phone than the Galaxy J7 Star, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. IPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x OS, while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie OS. IPhone 6s counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the iPhone 6s also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 6s has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly better 1334 x 750 pixels resolution. The iPhone 6s takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a much tinier aperture and a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The iPhone 6s has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy J7 Star has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 1715mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 6s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.