Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a global score of 81.6 against 73.1. The iPhone 7 is an older phone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but Apple managed to make it thinner and noticeably lighter. The iPhone 7 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy J7 Star, although it has lesser cpu cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The iPhone 7 features a better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density and a slightly better 750 x 1334 resolution. Apple iPhone 7 features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The iPhone 7 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 7 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.