Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a global score of 81.5, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star's overall score of 73.1. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy J7 Star works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) design is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a quite superior performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher 750 x 1334 resolution.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2020), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy J7 Star has a much better battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has an 81% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone SE (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone SE (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.