Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a general score of 88.1 against 73.1. IPhone X's body is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although they were only released with a few months difference. Apple iPhone X counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone X features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better pixels count per display inch, a quite larger screen and a way higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. IPhone X shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The iPhone X features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy J7 Star counts with greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.