Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star, with an 82 score against 73.1. Apple iPhone XR's design is a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star, and both were released with only 4 months difference. Apple iPhone XR features a brighter screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a just a little greater display pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a better resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 400 GB. IPhone XR has a better processor than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone XR captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera with a worse 12 MP resolution and a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
Galaxy J7 Star features a bit better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.