Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and a bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Star. The Google Pixel 4 features a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px, a much greater display density and a bit bigger display.
Google Pixel 4 features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 400 GB.
Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.