Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with an 82.9 score against 73.1. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's just a little thinner and also newer. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040, much more pixels per display inch and a little bigger screen. Google Pixel 4 XL captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy J7 Star features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.