Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a overall score of 82.9 against 73.1. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also much lighter and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera with less MP, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.