Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting an 87.5 score against 73.1. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is extremely newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much greater display density, a little larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a lot higher video resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3885mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.