Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a overall score of 89 against 73.1. Google Pixel 5 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way greater screen pixels density, a bit larger display and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.