Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 6a is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a general score of 76.4 against 73.1. Even though the Google Pixel 6a is a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's just a bit lighter and also a lot newer. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 6a has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a lot better processing power than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher display density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Google Pixel 6a has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 6a features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4410mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Google Pixel 6a has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 6a also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Google Pixel 6a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.