Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Honor 50 Pro has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's general score of 73.1. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Honor 50 Pro has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Honor 50 Pro is a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's just a bit thinner and extremely newer.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, much more pixels per display inch and a larger display.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low light situations, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a much better 108 MP resolution camera. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.