Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than Galaxy J7 Star, having a general score of 77 against 73.1. LG G7 Fit is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Star, even when both were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 Fit has an older 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 Fit counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. LG G7 Fit has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way better display density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy J7 Star has just a bit better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG G7 Fit takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.