Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Blue | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a general score of 85.4 against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG K92 design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, although it's also somewhat heavier.
The LG K92 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG K92 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG K92 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a better pixel density.
The LG K92 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. LG K92 has longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity. LG K92 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a way more MP back camera and a lot better video quality.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.