Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a score of 78.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's overall score of 73.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but LG V10 has the older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V10 construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it's a bit heavier.
The Galaxy J7 Star has a bit superior CPU than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores (although slower). The LG V10 has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a much greater pixel density.
LG V10 has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. LG V10 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V10, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.