Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Blue | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than Galaxy J7 Star, getting a global score of 87.6 against 73.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Star, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.