Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has the previous 10 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG Wing design is notably newer than Galaxy J7 Star's, although it is much thicker and notably heavier.
LG Wing features a brighter screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a much better 1080 x 2460px resolution. The LG Wing counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 224 GB more internal storage.
LG Wing features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Wing also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The LG Wing shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more MP and a lot better video resolution.
LG Wing counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.