Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 is much better than Galaxy J7 Star, having a overall score of 86.1 against 73.1. The Motorola Edge 20 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge 20 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better amount of pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 20 features a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot better video quality. Motorola Edge 20 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 has improved battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.