Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is better than the Galaxy J7 Star, getting an 84.7 score against 73.1. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is noticeably newer, just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has the older 12 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has 4 GB more RAM. Motorola Edge (2022) features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge (2022) takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola Edge (2022), but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.