Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a 78.5 score against 73.1. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has an older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion construction is extremely newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger display, a way higher count of pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy J7 Star features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.