Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a score of 81.9 against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is extremely newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, a lot better display density and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.