Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 overall score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy J7 Star, but both have the same thickness.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a higher screen density, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a way better video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light images and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.