Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LTPS |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a score of 81.5 against 73.1. Moto G 5G's construction is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G 5G has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto G 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.